I cant say I disagree with you completly. Except boost is better than no2 cuz its always there. Check out my newer vids, my best on 18" street tires is a 10.7@140.

all rice needs boost to go fast i am sorry but naturally aspirated hp is way better 440rwhp 11.5 on motor, my car has done a 10.6 @138mph on a 225 shot so goes to show you that a v8 is better period! Ricer fags

Mustangs r POOP!! No top end what so ever!!

boost vs stock lets put a vortec in that mustang then will see

not tryin to start a war but 13.8 all day in a stock 02 GT. and yea not bad for the supercharged civic would actually like to see the setup though.

nice vid , but i am not impressed, supercharged SI vs stock mustang GT . I would have expected better 1/4 mile times from civic si being supercharged , and as lite as it is , i also agree i would have ran a turbo setup on the civic . 14.33 is about right for a stock gt , you may be able to get a 13.9 if your a really good driver in a stock 99-04 gt but thats pushing it . k20 is a good motor . but i have seen 03 04 cobras take them on the strip stock .

I agree with the first guy. I got a 2004 Honda Civic Si Turboed with Turbonetics. It's best that all EP3's get HONDATA.

Nice civic smokes mustang, nice and fast civic.......

that was a nice race.im not gonna say that the mustang sucks or the civic b ecause i dont want to star a domestic versus import.i have an old american truk and a h22 91 hatch.but i think the mustang and civic r great.for a f ront wheel si supercharged vs a GT,im not impresed. i would go with turbo cuz supercharges arent so efficient in 4 bangers as they r with v8's.if t hat civic woulda had a k20.it would probably beat the mustang runing it al l motor. even if its a GT.cuz if an evo can hang with a gt or beat it. a c ivic with a k20 swap can beat a evo with no modifications.and its a 2.0l l ike the evo with no forced induction