lol, first: a vette handle better than an sti and a cobalt, two: the new turbo cobalt do 8:22min on nurburgring , same time for the 2004 STI. The balt is a bit less powerfull than the STI, so the balt handle better than the STI ... or find me an other explaination why the balt do the same time, maybe better break lol i dunno...

haha zero u dont care if they can handle like a vette??? a sti handles better.....

LOL, A cobalt SS called me out afew weeks back....He gave three honks and I took him by 10 lengths....Does the STI owner know how to drive?

nope sorry, i dont care if those cars run a 6.1 in a quarter and handle like a corvette. they are cheap looking inside and out, and from someone who worked at a chevy dealer believe me when i tell you, they are closer to cavaliers than you think

Well i understand u saying that ud rather have an Evo then an STi because thats just personal preference, almost the same d**n car. But PLEASE go back and fix when u said ud rather have an evo OR AN SRT-4 cuz that just makes u look very foolish, everything was good until that last sentence bro. SRT-4 = s**t compared to evo or sti.

cobalt SS 0-60 is 6.1 sec not 7 and 1/4 mile isnt 15.4 its 14.4 as recorded by several respected magazines. car and driver in '05 pulled a 5.9 0-60. Further, the cobalt shares only one thing with the cavalier and thats a shortened stroke version of the ecotec engine only with a forged steel crank and connecting rods. Chassis, transmission, steering, ect are all different. cavalier chassis is designated as J-body and cobalt is on the Delta platform. In either Motor Trend or Car and Driver the Cobalt SS out gunned, out cornered, out accelerated through the high speed "esses" of the challenging road course in Germany at a higher MPH than the 06 Civic Si, VW GTI, and a few other respected vehicles. The Cobalt SS is actually, believe it or not haters, is one of the best handling cars on the road far exceeding those in the same price range. Being a hater wont make your car any better.

whoops, i meants 205-215whp is around 250hp at the crank(where car companies rate their horsepower, except GM which usually ALWAYS underrates their cars, like the LS1 Camaros, GXP grand prixs, etc.)

from a roll, a ss cobalt can hang with a Sti, from a dig, its not a race... People need to stop magazine racing, first off the SS cobalt is "rated" at 205hp, but in REALITY those SAME cars are DYNOING at 205-215hp AT THE WHEELS, which would be equivalent to around 250hp at the wheels, so the difference in a Srt-4 and a Cobalt SS/Ion Redline ISN'T what people seem to think it is, in fact its a driver's race... And I know FOR A FACT a Srt-4 will take a Sti from a roll, once again, from a dig AWD>FWD, but this race isn't from a dig, so I think its very possible...

i have a cobaltss and stock i hung with my friends evo(which only had a bov) and i have stuck with stock sti's too but all from a roll and will occasionally beat one from a stop if the driver cant launch. how do i know i won?? they admitted it to me even though they were embaressed that my lil cobalt beat them only by like a 1/2 car though.

One thing I know is that the STI is super fast, but it lack so much top end. I could believe a modded cobalt ss could def give it a run past 90 mph.