*Turbo mustang vs turbo civic* Mustang= 760rwhp 1

Views: 13,725
+
=
Kudos: 115
Comments (59)
98saleen
23 hours ago
Send Message
 
heres the link to the FULL video....
98saleen
23 hours ago
Send Message
 
WHOEVER posted this is a liar.the civics the one that had a gt42r and it was dynoed at 749HP @ i imagine 35psi best ET 10.1@140the mustang had a turbo set-up and by the size it looks like it has a gt42r as well or even a 46 idk but the dyno results were the following600whp/13psi759whp/20psi1013whp/30psithe mustang was on 13 pounds on the race against the civic and the civic was on full boost"i second that this clip is taken from a build video for the wolverine mustang. so way to go dude for ripping other peoples videos and posting them with false #'s.
85transam
October 16, 2008
Send Message
 
o and adding boost allows you to pump more air and fuel through the motor giving the effect of increased displacement without actually having it
85transam
October 16, 2008
Send Message
 
lol 760 rwhp and an 11 sec pass ur dreamin he musta spun through the 1/8th which he didnt lol
DomesticDominator
September 28, 2008
Send Message
 
Shut the f**k up you know nothing 91 cobra. Increasing fuel and air have nothing to do with displacement unless you increase this due to a increase in displacement. Boring and or stroking increases displacement. Volumetric eff is increased by chamber designe cams exhaust intake, etc... A turbo increases mass not volume but any definition you read will tell you that adding a turbo will increase ve which I believe to be false. If you count the turbo as part of the motor than yes but guess what its not part of the motor. A motor can surplus 100% ve through resonance tuning which creates small amounts of boost on its own. Thank you
dohc91cobra
June 08, 2007
Send Message
 
LOL.. So moving more air and fuel ISNT effectively increasing an engines displacement? MAYBE, just maybe... you should do more research before you make arrogant comments, that make you look stupid.. even more stupid than the people who try to explain how and why FI increases displacement. Short and simple... anytime you effectively move more air and fuel through an engine, you increase the engines displacement capabilities or VE.. *Volumetric Efficiency*. May it be use of a turbo, supercharger... nitrous... or even boring and stroking... it all allows the engine to injest or move more air and fuel.
ismaelcrx
April 21, 2007
Send Message
 
WHOEVER posted this is a liar.

the civics the one that had a gt42r and it was dynoed at 749HP @ i imagine 35psi+ best ET 10.1@140

the mustang had a turbo set-up and by the size it looks like it has a gt42r as well or even a 46 idk but the dyno results were the following

600whp/13psi
759whp/20psi
1013whp/30psi

the mustang was on 13 pounds on the race against the civic and the civic was on full boost
377349
April 03, 2007
Send Message
 
STUPID people. Wolverine is WAY faster than that civic. ALOT faster. that run was on lowest boost. idiots.

This RICER copied the vid and edited it with Gangster rap crap and made it look like the rice was great. watch the ORIGINAL vid you tools.

That mustang traps 151mph and not even on highest boost. look up WOLVERINE in search, or on turbomustangs.com

bunch of ricer fan boys.
ForceFedGSR
March 03, 2007
Send Message
 
BUT it feels like i have 5 engines after i added my turbo so i must have more displasment right????hhahhhah
9ed161d1
February 21, 2007
Send Message
 
that dude that said something about adding FI increases your displacement is a idiot.......please tell me how a turbo makes your engine bigger....stop reading books and get some real knowledge
Boostage
Videos: 19
Photos: 0
46
Added: Apr 11, 2006
*Turbo mustang vs turbo civic*
Mustang= 760rwhp 15psi (Big GT42R turbo)
Civic=553whp 25psi (Little...
Sponsored Links