Login
|
Register
|
Help
My Home
View My Profile
Edit My Profile
Account Settings
Messages
Videos
Browse
My Videos
Upload
Photos
Browse
My Photos
Upload
Members
Browse
My Friends
Invite Friends
Rides
Browse
My Rides
Create Rides
Events
Browse
My Events
Create Event
Groups
Browse
My Groups
Create Group
Channels
Channels
Shows
Blog
*Turbo mustang vs turbo civic* Mustang= 760rwhp 1
Share
Favorites
Add to...
Chapters
Report
Report Video as Inappropriate
Your comment must be at least 5 chars
Message
Submit
My Profile
Make this the default video on my profile
Add
My Playlists
Add to
Click to select
Edit playlists
Add
My Rides
Add to/Remove from my StreetFire Rides
My Events
Add to/Remove from my StreetFire Events
My Photos
Add to/Remove from my StreetFire Photo Albums
Upload photos!
My Groups
Add to/Remove from my StreetFire Groups
Favorite
Delete this video from your favorites list
MySpace
Facebook
Digg
del.icio.us
Views:
13,725
Favorited:
10
+
Links:
105
=
Kudos:
115
Comments (59)
< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
Next >
Post Comment
98saleen
23 hours ago
Send Message
heres the link to the FULL video....
+0
Edit
|
Delete
|
Inappropriate
98saleen
23 hours ago
Send Message
WHOEVER posted this is a liar.the civics the one that had a gt42r and it was dynoed at 749HP @ i imagine 35psi best ET 10.1@140the mustang had a turbo set-up and by the size it looks like it has a gt42r as well or even a 46 idk but the dyno results were the following600whp/13psi759whp/20psi1013whp/30psithe mustang was on 13 pounds on the race against the civic and the civic was on full boost"i second that this clip is taken from a build video for the wolverine mustang. so way to go dude for ripping other peoples videos and posting them with false #'s.
+0
Edit
|
Delete
|
Inappropriate
85transam
October 16, 2008
Send Message
o and adding boost allows you to pump more air and fuel through the motor giving the effect of increased displacement without actually having it
+0
Edit
|
Delete
|
Inappropriate
85transam
October 16, 2008
Send Message
lol 760 rwhp and an 11 sec pass ur dreamin he musta spun through the 1/8th which he didnt lol
+0
Edit
|
Delete
|
Inappropriate
DomesticDominator
September 28, 2008
Send Message
Shut the f**k up you know nothing 91 cobra. Increasing fuel and air have nothing to do with displacement unless you increase this due to a increase in displacement. Boring and or stroking increases displacement. Volumetric eff is increased by chamber designe cams exhaust intake, etc... A turbo increases mass not volume but any definition you read will tell you that adding a turbo will increase ve which I believe to be false. If you count the turbo as part of the motor than yes but guess what its not part of the motor. A motor can surplus 100% ve through resonance tuning which creates small amounts of boost on its own. Thank you
+0
Edit
|
Delete
|
Inappropriate
dohc91cobra
June 08, 2007
Send Message
LOL.. So moving more air and fuel ISNT effectively increasing an engines displacement? MAYBE, just maybe... you should do more research before you make arrogant comments, that make you look stupid.. even more stupid than the people who try to explain how and why FI increases displacement. Short and simple... anytime you effectively move more air and fuel through an engine, you increase the engines displacement capabilities or VE.. *Volumetric Efficiency*. May it be use of a turbo, supercharger... nitrous... or even boring and stroking... it all allows the engine to injest or move more air and fuel.
+0
Edit
|
Delete
|
Inappropriate
ismaelcrx
April 21, 2007
Send Message
WHOEVER posted this is a liar.
the civics the one that had a gt42r and it was dynoed at 749HP @ i imagine 35psi+ best ET 10.1@140
the mustang had a turbo set-up and by the size it looks like it has a gt42r as well or even a 46 idk but the dyno results were the following
600whp/13psi
759whp/20psi
1013whp/30psi
the mustang was on 13 pounds on the race against the civic and the civic was on full boost
+0
Edit
|
Delete
|
Inappropriate
377349
April 03, 2007
Send Message
STUPID people. Wolverine is WAY faster than that civic. ALOT faster. that run was on lowest boost. idiots.
This RICER copied the vid and edited it with Gangster rap crap and made it look like the rice was great. watch the ORIGINAL vid you tools.
That mustang traps 151mph and not even on highest boost. look up WOLVERINE in search, or on turbomustangs.com
bunch of ricer fan boys.
+1
Edit
|
Delete
|
Inappropriate
ForceFedGSR
March 03, 2007
Send Message
BUT it feels like i have 5 engines after i added my turbo so i must have more displasment right????hhahhhah
+0
Edit
|
Delete
|
Inappropriate
9ed161d1
February 21, 2007
Send Message
that dude that said something about adding FI increases your displacement is a idiot.......please tell me how a turbo makes your engine bigger....stop reading books and get some real knowledge
+0
Edit
|
Delete
|
Inappropriate
< Previous
1
2
3
4
5
Next >
Boostage
Videos:
19
Photos:
0
46
Added:
Apr 11, 2006
show more
*Turbo mustang vs turbo civic*
Mustang= 760rwhp 15psi (Big GT42R turbo)
Civic=553whp 25psi (Little...
*Turbo mustang vs turbo civic*
Mustang= 760rwhp 15psi (Big GT42R turbo)
Civic=553whp 25psi (Little Sc61 turbo)
For those that dont know, a GT42R is twice the size of an sc61. Civic still ate him with a Turbo half the size with only 10psi difference
Link
Embed
Forum Embed
Tags:
Similar Videos
View All
mustang vs must...
Added:
Jan 09,2009
Views:
15
STARION ON STOC...
Added:
Jan 09,2009
Views:
15
chrome and carb...
Added:
Jan 09,2009
Views:
168
More Videos from Boostage
View All
Added Events
View All
Added Rides
View All
Added Groups
View All
Added Albums
View All
Sponsored Links
You must be logged in to do that
Close X
Already a Member?
Login below, remember that you will receive 12 Kudos just for logging in.
Email Address
Password
Keep me logged in
Login
Not Yet a Member?
Join StreetFire today.
Join