Yeah maybe NOW the RT/10 goes for 35, but when he bought it, it cost $50k. He didn't buy it yesterday. Mike, who is posting on here, owns the Saleen and $29k is what he paid for it. Pretty good price for an extensively modified Saleen if you ask me.

he never came close to losing it, just a little tailing out...nothing wrong with that.

and everyone keep bashing the cars you have never owned or even driven! makes you all sound real smart! after you drive cars of this caliber then come back and talk about how much they suck. what do you have to compare it to anyway? your 91 accord? come on now people.

hate to admit it but that was actually a pretty sweet pass but the saleen o n the stretch. Not to mention that year rt/10 is slow as h**l but owell.

ok..used RT/10 viper with decently low miles goes for around 35k...you guys are thinkin the SRT10 which is like in the 70's i believe...but i've seen viper GTS and RT/10s for sale with as low as 10k miles on them for 35k-45k and some as low as 30k...now on topic...those are both pretty awesome cars

Mr. Schumacher, as im sure you're aware of, that tends to happen with 600+ rwhp on a technical course like it was. I really don't remember ever really coming close to loosing. I could have gotten sideways on every corner if I wanted to, but we all know we dont any cool points for drifting..

Both cars had pretty bad understeer. The guy in the mustang almost lost it early on in the race.

You can see the Mustang driver was a better driver, The viper was on the brakes early, went wide on the turns and was on the gas later.Put an equal driver behind the wheel and the results might be different.

sweet!!!!!!!

I'm sorry, but your retarded.

on each accelaration the viper was faster until he let the mustang go

There is no way a Viper is going to out pace a Veyron unless you give it like 1000bhp and sticky shoes.. bear this in mind >> If you let a McLAren F1 accelerate to 120MPH before you put your foot down in the Veyron, the Veyron will reach 200MPH before the McLaren F1..