STM Evo vs AMS Evo vs Turbo GTO


 
Add to Favorites Chapters Add to Profile Report
Comments(37)
damstr  (July 02, 2008)
0  
Join Date:
Mar 09, 2008
US
Posts(139)

Should've run much longer then that. Horsepower isn't even a factor at those low speeds.

Send Message    Inappropriate
Z28ERIC  (June 25, 2008)
0  
Join Date:
Feb 29, 2008
US
Posts(385)

THOSE ARE ALL FAST CARS NO DOUBT ,BUT THAT GTO SHOULD DO BETTER THAN THAT,NOT SAYING HE'LL WIN BUT IT IS A FAST CAR TOO BEING TURBO.....

Send Message    Inappropriate
StreetTunedMo...  (June 25, 2008)
0  
Join Date:
Apr 30, 2008
US
Posts(167)

The STM Evo was full weight also...

Send Message    Inappropriate
HondaMuch  (June 25, 2008)
0  
Join Date:
Jun 17, 2008
US
Posts(147)

its gatta be

Send Message    Inappropriate
 
From: StreetTunedMotorsports
Videos: 15
Photos:33
Views: 4,251Added:April 30, 2008
StreetTuned 35R stock motor Evo VS AMS built car with a 37r@38psi making 710whp VS a rear sts turbo GTO making 649.8whp check out our website www.stmdsm.com...andour other videos!!!
Ad Feedback
Collapse/Expand
More Videos From:
Display: 
Detail View Thumbnail View
Collapse/Expand
Similar Videos:
Display: 
Detail View Thumbnail View