cuda won the last race..and burned out half the way.

audi leaves early race 1

at the end of the day...which car would you rather drive home in...(i'll take the nova...anytime you need 6 people to hold a car doing a burnout..your a champ in my book)

Still looking for a video of 900 AWHP vs. 500 RWHP. And again... still looking for an educated answer. 'the Audi hooked because it didn't have enough power to over-power the street'. Of course Audi has more traction than the other two, it's AWD --> No need to resort back to Physics 101. 60' times are only a small fraction of the race. I've watched a stock 185 AWHP Audi hit 1.8s 60' times at a track - which is same as many 350 RWHP muscle at the same track. No shit the Audi gets chased down on the big end, it has far less power. Yet, you think that this Audi has more HP than the muscle here? - I say that because of your initial comment... I'd like to see the numbers of each, but I bet the Audi has less than the others = reason why it was run down on the big end. Quit dodging the question, show me why you think 900 vs 500 is an unfair matchup for the 900 car...?

How about you come out to our track and run your AWD against our 2wd for some $$$$. We will not have more then 500hp to the tire. Can you hit short times(60's)in the 1.25 range? It's all about time to distance-if you don't have an AWD ricer or foriegn car, then maybe as a "nutswinger" you can talk one of these guys into it. The fact that the Audi in the vid hooked was becuase it didn't have enough power to over-power the street. The Old cars did. Lifting on and off the gas, the AWD that hooked still got run down.

Sure, mind explaining your math on that one?I'd like for you to show me one video... And I guarantee if you could find one then I can explain why it isn't the norm = doesn't happen all the time. A car with 900whp is still 900whp whether it's through 4 wheels or 2. Weight is the biggest factor in an AWD car vs. muscle car - but most AWD cars have advanced frame to make up for the defect of the rust bucket. Many AWD race cars out there are equal or less weight than the 'muscle cars' you speak of. So, spend 10k on both, w/ equal horsepower (~500), gears, at prepped track, good luck w/ bet on that one. Now, ~DOUBLE HP of the AWD, (~900), I'm not certain how you can assume muscle car stands a chance.Better yet, instead of your 'nutswinger' comments, show me a video. HaHa - or go race that 'muscle' of yours vs. a 900 hp AWD and show us the video... So many questions, lookin' for a single educated answer.

" You must know everything there is to know. " -yes, any questions?Nutswingers,lol

lol @ 'happens all the time'... You must know everything there is to know.

AWD streetcar hooks on the street. But race at a prepped track and watch the awd audi get druggg. It would only take a 500hp muscle car to drag a 900hp audi/supra/etc at a prepped track. Happens' all the time.

No doubt that Cuda gave the C4 a chase-down! All great cars - and all would perform better on the track. @06A4 --> Engine not same as UrQuattro, though basic similarities, AAN had slightly larger displacement, DOHC (UrQuattro had 10v), and Bosch Motronic. This car had only '91 200tq as predecessor in US. Of course, this urS4 far from stock... Great video, great cars..