To like the way these cars sound is sorta of a "mothers love" thing...lol. It has grown on my and I like it now. I had an 02 gt with full mac exhaust. When I bought the 07 I bought the same Mac setup for it and it sounded NOTHING like the 02. Way louder, raspier and droned/vibrated like hell. Needless to say my setup has changed a few times since then. I'm happy with the stock muffs. It's hard to find a good sound with these 3v's. But 04bullit, I ran a 13.5 bone stock. air filter to the tires. Your buddies time isn't very impressive considering the mods. I ran a 13.0 prior to the LT's, delete plates and dyno tune on Mickey DR's. Hoping for a 12.6 -12.7 ish next time around. Maybe you all are higher elevation??

i got a friend with lng tube headers o/r x bassani exhaust c.n.l cold air tune and a short throw and didnt even come close to the numbers you put down and on dr.s best time of a 13.2 so yeah u must have one hell of a freak car,ive been told by several that i have one also.nice ride though

nice stuff, not a fan of the way that 3v sounds tho...

True;)

one run doesnt mean anything. iv seen stock auto's do a 13.2. Must of just been a bad driver mad that he lost to a good driver :)

NASTY01CAMARO auto 2010 camaro are difinely not low 13 cars stock. I was at Sacramento Racway 2 weeks ago with my roush and i raced an automatic 2010 SS Camaro his best time he manage to pull in HIS car was a 14.1 no BS. I ran a 13.2 on that run. The excuse the driver in the camaro told me is that the camaro have 3 traction control switchs to choose from and didnt know which one to use. Really they all seemed to all take off with no wheel spin and how hard is it to keep the pedal down. Either way there nice cars!

so an auto trans SS you might take but a manual trans SS will smoke you... great job chevy. anyone who buys an auto SS deserves the less hp anyways. but what i dont get is that if the HP put down is waaay less than the manual why are the automatics still putting 0-60 times of 4.7 sec and low quarter 13 sec quarter times??? sounds like somthings fishy here. wouldnt you think? hey if your running low 13's but you dyno the car and it says your at 315 hp weighing at 3900 pounds, id say you have one hell of a car. just my two cents. Hey thanks i like you mustang too!

If you do a search on google you will find all kinds of other 2010 auto camaro owners saying that the car dynoed 300-325hp. Also the camaro had less than 1000 miles. Considering that my car makes more power and weighs less, I'm not sure that it would "smoke" me. Regardless, it would be a good race. As for the vid you posted I would bet its a manual trans = more power. Thanks for props though! Nice F-Body you have as well. My room mate has an LT1 so I got the lil war thing going on in my house...lol.Check out this vid: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tcRAgoQDkLM

I was surprised at my numbers were as well considering minor mods. The guy did a baseline before any tuning and it was 320hp and 342tq (had and email brenspeed tune). Then he made many adjustments and 6 pulls later he had it dialed in perfect. He spent a couple hours an my car. Great work. If anyone is looking for a good tuner in va beach, I rec Brent at DTP Racing. And yes every dyno varies as well as weather altitude and ect... now it's time for some ET's. Thats what really matters. I did manage to run a 13.5 bone stock, so I may have a bit of a factory freak as well. Anyways, thanks for the comments!

http://videos.streetfire.net/video/2010-CAMARO-SS-DYNO_700570.htm 2010SS with just full exhaust. almost 400 RWHP... somethings fishy about tho's numbers you got. i know auto will always loose power but its def not 314 hp. needless to say it would smoke your GT. Oh btw very nice numbers you got there with just exhaust, intake and tune. your mustang sounds very good.