|
|
|
You so googled it dude :-) hehe
|
|
|
|
Mods and BOSS 302ci my a$$. That thing is a shame and i don't think it classifies as muscle car, it is a classic i'll give him that.
|
|
|
I had the chance to drive a 66 mustang with a 289 all stock i think is the slowest car i've ever been in.
And by the way i don't think they put a 302 motor till 1968 mustangs.
I really hope they didn't take out already crappy 289ci to put that crappy 302ci in it.
Congrats to the TC anyways.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(f5c05088) the C5 Z06 still kills the terminator. not just the C6 Z06, man even the C6 non Z06 will take a cobra.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Man i dislike the car and the visual upgrades you did to it, but every1 has different taste. I wish the best of luck to you and your next car. Happy Tunning Dude.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thats a great race guys +1 from me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
You can tell what motor it has by looking at the headlights LT1's have 4 small1s, and LS1 got 2 big1s.
|
|
|
I've seen 2 dyno's from stock 1992 300ZX's TT the lowest made 243.7rwhp 261.6ft-tq and the best was 249.6rwhp and 266.3ft-tq and weight 3312 lbs.
Thats 13.26 weight/whp.
Pretty darn nice for a 15 year old car but still not in the 98-02 z28 power to weight ratio if the car is running like it should.
|
|
|
|
You have to have more mods on that 300 then listed, or there is something wrong with that LS1. No offence, other then that congrats on the win.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Time for an (AUTOMATIC) trans am (jesus thats bad shifting)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Killer car, how $ total?, looks like a nice setup for mine :-)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've seen 94 LT1 vs 2003 GT with same outcome both 100% stock.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I think i'm gonna go with 3.73's. The stock 2.73's are stupidly long. It should make a big difference.
|
|
|
|
|