Uploaded Favorites Comments
123456789101112131415
image
This is my sons frist wheelie in his own car he is only 16 years old
From: next1
2,437 views
score (+3)
10 comments
October 02, 2007
It was a joke relax......Were you pulling wheelies before you could drive after 9 pm?
 
 
That looked safe :-)
 
image
srt4 0-60 from a dig.
From: 50da13ad
3,211 views
score (+3)
15 comments
October 02, 2007
recount.....it starts @ 3 and ends at 9 as stated before he was granny shifting....it took almost a full second to shift from 1st to 2nd.
 
 
5.5- 6 seconds not bad since you granny shifted into 2nd :-)
 
image
ROAD RAGE - CLK 55 AMG BEATS COBRA
From: shags
19,197 views
score (-8)
79 comments
October 02, 2007
f2081ef4.....funny at the same time your calling people dumb your posting links that wont ever show up......try spaces in between your links.
 
 
You need to get some azz......your to high strung. Relax....oh by the way you didn't beat anything if both of your werent racing at the same time :-/
 
image
Eric's Audi TT Quattro 19psi. VS. STI VS. SRT-4 VS. SC300
From: b6fbf4a9
2,106 views
score (-2)
7 comments
October 02, 2007
Why? Please no camera phone videos.
 
image
Lima Racing- 04 SRT-4 vs 2JZ MKIII supra single turbo
From: andrew05c
4,311 views
score (+4)
50 comments
October 01, 2007
292042......sure you do buddy....everyone on streetfire has a 750 hp supra....to bad you couldn't post any videos of it.....Must still be paying of the credit card and can't afford a camera huh?
 
image
srt-4 on dyno. 506hp For All My SRT-4 haters... heres the dyno sheet. sorry it took soo long, ...
From: FernandoP
3,657 views
score (0)
21 comments
September 30, 2007
Need to see the sheets...but when he switches from 3rd to 4th......it's probably about 60-65 mph to about 120-125 mph......It goes by in 8-9 seconds.
 
image
I can't explain it. Can you?
From: TheDarkKnight
6,212 views
score (+9)
23 comments
September 29, 2007
I don't see it being raw sewage and the guy walking around in it taking his time.....I woulda got the F outa dodge.
 
image
LS2 GTO vs Neon SRT-4 vs GMC ECSB Truck
From: HybridZ28
6,358 views
score (+6)
21 comments
September 28, 2007
MyHondasslow are you a little insecure there buddy?
 
 
That truck is nasty nice vid. ECSB?? Extended cab short bed?
 
image
How fast dose a supercharged SS camaro go?
From: darknight
9,159 views
score (+5)
31 comments
September 28, 2007
check OP other vids.
 
 
150 seems to be the last number on the dash. I would say est. of 165 maybe 170.
 
 
I'm sure it had more.......If it wasn't at redline.
 
image
Gas saving Tornado, fuel saving, Put a Tornado test on ABC News unit - Jeep Cherokee 4.0!
From: hm2334
3,945 views
score (+1)
35 comments
September 27, 2007
Conflicting information on VE.......Since VE is based on what the motor is taking in compared to the max it could take in at atmospheric conditions I will recant my statement about forced induction. If you increase the intake pressure above atmospheric pressure then you would obviously increase VE.
 
 
But you can't increase velocity without changing the motor intake track in some way. What cold air intakes are doing is removing a restrictive piece or lowering velocity and bringing in cooler air. Just because velocity decreases does not mean the amount of air going through the intake is less. For instance go to your A/C filter and take a piece of paper and stick it over the return. What you'll hear is an increase in turbulence and a decrease in CFM if you have a vane anemometer. Your not increasing VE of the motor with an air intake your removing the restriction to where the next bottle neck is the actual motor itself. Manufacturers make intakes restrictive to cut down on intake noise by adding things like a "silencer" box..... I haven't used one either :-) but their theory doesn't pan out unless the motor somehow can bring more air into the cyl which it is just not going to do with a orange slicer. The idea came from a tornado obviously which is fine in dandy in a very large open space. In the confines of an intake tract it's useless. All in good fun though I would like to see more test as one poster already said it was a waste on his "fleet"
 
 
If it increased volume or pressure then you would have more air intake but it doesn't do either one. Velocity only changes with engine rpm or in case of a turbocharged car under pressure (forced). You could change velocity by making the intake track smaller but adding a swirl device will not change velocity. In physics what is the fastest from point A to point B? Straight line or running around in a circle?
 
 
It may work on carberated engines though. Anything that controls the air to fuel ratio at 14.7 it's going to make little to no difference.
 
 
So how does it pull more air than the motor can take in on it's own? It takes something like bigger valves or a valve job or worked heads to increase VE. To increase VE the motor must be able to pull more air into the cyl using the exact same sized cyl.....i.e. efficiency. This item will not make your motor more efficient. The above poster was correct with GM using this "Vortec" technology......however the entire intake track is setup for the swirl combustion. If you look in Mass Air Flow sensor they have a screen inside most stock sensors something similar to a screen that would go over your window at your home. This isn't to block debris because that's what the filter does. It's to defuse the intake air where it will combust better when mixed with gas. Read up on VE...http: //www .engine logics.com/ cmaps. html.....(remove the spaces)
 
123456789101112131415