|
|
Yup you to can have an evo for $21,500 and it only has 55,000 miles on it...Thats not even as much as I paid for mine with 50 miles on and a 84,000 mile warranty. Plus I don't have mitsu sending out reps to the race track to void warranties of people racing.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/2003... 1QQcategoryZ43919QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZView... one on ebay...
|
|
|
|
LOL.....wow awd drive takes skills to launch now? They takes kills to do anything besides rally racing? My windows roll down with a "button" It's a shame man we are all in it for the love of cars. But your ignorance and just straight stupid claims shows that yes even evo owners have dumbazzs in their community also. I think you missed his point...lets put it this way for the 35,000 your claiming you can run low 12's with...you can have a fully built DCR motor with 650+ hp and all the traction mods with a built tranny....Hmm lets see who wins those races. Ohh you can check them out lookup all your favorite size big turbos on here in the search menu then look for evo vs srt...see what happens to the best of your evo community....Except AMS of course there cars are sick and like the above poster said if you want that youll have to pay for it.
|
|
|
|
Can't argue with you there. I agree.
|
|
|
|
Your a hoot 2mivec.....you hate srt's so much and you start a new handle with srt in it....Your a joke.
|
|
|
|
hes not worth the trouble of even trying to educate him.. He came on after I pretty much showed him how he got ripped off from his tuner. He came on with the name 04srt4 look at the last post on this video. It's quiet amusing actually.
|
|
|
|
Hate comes from a feeling of being threatened or a feeling of loss of power....Just something to think about when you guys show that you hate something.
|
|
|
|
You joined 23 minutes ago huh? Your lame...
|
|
|
|
You can get mad and call names and whatever you want. I'm trying to help you out so when you get up next to something that truly does have 342 whp and weighs the same and you get left in the dust....your not scratching your head thinking what happened and thinking maybe you just can't drive.
|
|
|
right....you lost 2 horsepower.....well if you have corrected number why are you going around claiming your uncorrected power.....keep lying to yourself....
Education....it will help you out in the long run.
|
|
|
that post has absolutely no basis they are still using uncorrected numbers even by the guy claiming...
"I recently tuned a friend's IX that has MBC, o2 housing, TBE, Licp, and a intake and it made 351/312 (DLL) on a cool evening (60F), but on a hot day it only makes 320 (90F). Prior to the inake being added it only made 330 even on cold nights. He put in Cams and we went out yesterday but they didnt seem to do much for the car or more tuning is necessary to extract the power from them."
Does that sound corrected to you..?
None of those are corrected numbers....Im telling you educate yourself.
You'll find people will take advantage of the fact you just don't know. They are taking your money and giving you some bs claim and laughing to the bank.
|
|
|
|
a company that basically lied to you and toom your money without telling you exactly what you did make compared to others...they gave you a number that can't be used in the real world to compare to other dynos....On a dynojet my car could make anywhere from 250 crank to 350 crank hp...stock and we know thats not the case.....it makes about 270 cranks and 230 to the wheels and thats a known fact...Evos on a regular basis using corrected dyno numbers make about 300 crank and 225 to 240 wheel...
|
|
|
here Ill help educate you...
"Note that Dynojet also makes dynos that include an eddy-current brake, such as the model 250, but that addition brings with it both advantages and disadvantages. The advantages are that the oxygen level readings can be better synchronized with the power readings by controlling the rate of acceleration, and by actively controlling the rate of deceleration, wear on the test vehicles' mechanical systems can be reduced. The disadvantages include the fact that the horsepower readings are obfuscated even further. With the addition of an eddy- current brake to the system, the calibration software must take into consideration both the inertial forces from the drum and the power absorption of the eddy-current brake.
With the Dynojet system, horsepower is treated like a byproduct of proper air/fuel ratio selection. This is evident when a Power Commander map is developed, as this process is based on setting air/fuel ratios to a pre-determined, arbitrary number across the RPM range. While this procedure can be accomplished very quickly using sweep tests and the integrated software suite that Dynojet has developed, the optimization criteria are based exclusively on circumstantial data. If the optimization criteria are changed to include maximum power output and smoothness, expect an exponential increase in testing time.
Finally, I fail to see the certainty in spending a “lottery-sized” sum of money on a water-brake test cell and a staff of engineers to maintain and calibrate the system. (Use of hyperbole of these dimensions is typically discouraged within technical writings.) Clearly, if the author is willing to accept a five percent error band, a considerably less expensive and substantially more practical solution can be found."
http://www.factorypro.com/maga... Compare
OK. You ran your car on a dyno and its computer spit out a bunch of power and torque numbers. In fact, you have two sets: uncorrected, or "raw," numbers and corrected numbers. Gearheads love to compare numbers. Each dyno is subjected to different atmospheric conditions. To facilitate comparison, there has to be a "standard" to which dyno results conform or are "corrected." In the United States this is usually Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) standard J1349 Rev JUN90. Correcting to SAE J1349 alters the data to make it seem as if it was taken when the atmospheric pressure was 29.23 in/hg., the temperature 77° F and the humidly zero.
The degree to which temperature, pressure and humidity affect power output is constant. If we accurately measure those parameters at the dyno location, we’ll know the difference between the atmospheric conditions at the time and location of our test and those of SAE J1349. That difference is applied to the raw data and the result is corrected power and torque which we can compare to other data taken anywhere in the world that is also corrected to J1349.
The DynoWare EX+ measures and inputs all variables relating to the correction process. Older Dynojet hardware (an expansion board in a 286 or better PC running MS-DOS) requires the operator to measure humidity with the other variables inputted automatically. The software does the corrections based on the atmospheric data.
The older PEP software (v4.x) corrects only to SAE J1349. The newest WinPEP (v6.03) corrects to not only J1349, but to other standards, including "standard corrected", popular with aftermarket manufacturers (no doubt because it uses 29.92 in/hg and 68°F to get bigger numbers), "EEC", used in Asia and parts of Europe, and "DIN", used in Germany."
http://www.idavette.net/hib/... I said before educate yourself before making claims....assumptions always cost you money...you got your dyno numbers from
|
|
|
|
everytime you post you make yourself look much more stupid you should have just left it at neon neon neon....Now we have the proof your a dumbazz thanks to you...
|
|
|
that was the answer to this question...
" cleverusername Status: Offline
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 7
cleverusername is on a distinguished road
hey, out of curiosity, what kind of dyno were those numbers on?"
|
|
|
shut up dumbazz....from your own thread
ISP Racing Status: Offline
"dynojet uncorrected"
Do you even know what that means? Post #19 from the guys that tuned your car....
|
|
|
|
This dude is a chump people in his own evo community have called him out on his dyno numbers lol..He's played himself out.
|
|
|
|
So whos photobucket did you really post up here...LOL
|
|
|
|
Upon further investigation you have people in your own community calling BS on your 342 awhp....Keep your lies up dumbazz...One day someone might believe them. Not even AMS (maybe you heard of em) Can get 342 awhp from what you "claim" to have. matter of fact with all bolt ons on a stock turbo they only get 390....thats "everything possible" http://www.amsperformance.com/
|
|
|
|
LOL.....well thats what a whiny lil B*tch would do. Neon Neon Neon Neon....You have so much hate for the car I wonder why? Check my post I have said many good things about lancer evolutions....Unfortunately you give the owners a bad rep just as dumbazz that own srt's do the same thing...educate yourself you'll be much happier in life.
|
|
|
|