|
|
|
That, coming from a mustang owner is ironic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Damn boner time at the mustang club. Nice stang my buddy has an 05. But can that stang auto-x/road race/rally or possibly do anything better than the evo with the exeption of burning out? C'mon fellas, talking shit about a car you don't know anything about just makes you look like a dumb hick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prettyuch how my race went with my stock turbo bolt on evo vs a GSX 750
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The X isn't a drag car. Just becasue it gets beat from a roll doesn't means it's slow. Take the X to a real track where it's supposed to be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loos like the AMS single. The dual set is better looking INO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nice work mellon. Iguess those tunes and Buschur parts are doing there job.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Damn, dude has some skill driving.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fast civic. How they all should be done.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Agreed. Something different. Nice work.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Close races. Hearing the missed shifts on the louder cars at the track is always funny.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DESU. How are the new evos dissapointing? Are you talking about the looks or performance? Opinions about how a car looks are completely up the the person, everyone has there tastes. Performance wise the new engine is make far more power with bolt-on parts than the 4G. Wait untill some proper tuning software comes out for the X and people are gonna start reconsidering. Not knocking the 4G63 ever BTW.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Probably ETS since they just came out with a 3.5 race exhaust.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
I agree Bob the 4G63 is and always will be the best 4 cylinder engine capable of withstanding rediculous amounts of boost. But the 4B11 is looking very promising due to an improved head and is making alot more hp/tq with bolt-ons than the 4G.
|
|
|
|
|